The Jesus Controversy 5

The Orion and the Garden of Eden

I think I have already mentioned this elsewhere in this blog, when I unexpectedly found myself on some planet somewhere within the Orion Constellation.  It happened during an initiation just over ten years ago.  The entire experience lasted for no more than 1 minute.  Naturally, I was in the spirit.  The first feeling I had was an overpowering sense of home sickness.  I knew that this was the place from whence I came.  Maybe even originated there.  I ended up near some cheaply constructed dwelling consisting of branches and leaves, definitely not a permanent dwelling, suggesting that the people were nomads, staying in the one place only so long without depleting the area they occupied.  I only saw about 3 people, human, tall and dressed in thin linen gowns with patterns, suggesting a constant warm climate.  These people were not aware of my presence, or at least they made no effort in acknowledging me.  The environment was indescribable and what was going through my thoughts was the Garden of Eden.  

Did the ancients know of this place?  Is this why they were so fascinated with the Orion that even the Giza Plateau is a star map of that constellation, the three pyramids representing the belt?  Was this world the dream of the pharaohs?  Maybe.  Who knows.  I've been pondering this ever since - is this the place from which I have fallen, or is it simply just one of many worlds in which I have lived?  Although Spirit may show you things they don't particularly give you the answers, but let you ponder on the mystery of your own existence.

I am also convinced that we don't all come from the same place but we are resolving our karma together on this piece of dust.  We recognize ourselves as physical beings, and somewhere along the way we have been classified as "human beings" but the learned know that the body is simply a vehicle in which some manner of spirit consciousness resides, but know not from where this consciousness has come from, or where this consciousness has been in the past, and what manner of karmic judgment this spirit consciousness must endure.  In fact, we don't know what manner of creature resides in anyone's body.  It can either be good or evil.  I've seen some very ugly spirits concealed within human flesh.  There are others also who testify that the greater element are close to demonic.  This is a very real fact and we are all having a human experience.

Lets face it, the universe is filled with many different worlds, and on many of these worlds, the intelligent life that exists there is not what we would recognize as human.  But it is not the physical body, the vehicle that is important, but the driver controlling that vehicle.  If you study our physical vehicles, our bodily construction, we are hardly suitable to exist comfortably within earthly conditions in our raw state.  By raw state I mean, look at the animals in their natural state, they are entirely adapted to cope within their environment.  Evolution has given them exactly what they need in order to survive on this planet.  If we were to live here relying solely on what evolution has given us, for example, take away our clothes, our heating, we could simply not survive in our natural environmental state of nakedness.  We are not indigenous to this plant.  There some who suggest that the Neanderthal is the indigenous species of this world, and there is evidence that Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens have for some time co-existed.  They also believe that Bigfoot, or its various other names around the world, are a surviving remnant of Neanderthal. 

Consider every species of life on this planet and how each species fits in perfectly into its natural environment and how it is engineered to survive within that environment.  The monkey has no need to light fires, live in houses or don fur coats if the weather turns chilly.  It is indigenous to this world and its immediate environment.  The only creature out of place is the human species.  So we need to ask ourselves: was the famed Garden of Eden ever on this planet?  Or is this place where we were banished to?  Adam and Eve were naked within their environment as much as the monkey can be considered naked in his environment.  What caused Adam to cover himself with a fig leaf?  What made him come aware of his natural state of nakedness, and be ashamed?

cosmic-rays-point-to-orion

The Jesus Controversy 4

Blood line and Spirit line

We who are incarnated into these physical bodies are subjected to two distinct evolutionary lines.  The line that is mainly influenced by karma we call the bloodline, and it is the family blood lines we continuously incarnate into.  The more one frees oneself from karma the more control we gain over any particular bloodline.  The more we evolve the more free we become and the more we can choose of what is, and what is not to inflict us while we are down here.  The more we can plan our own destinies.  Mind you, some of us, have a tendency to take on too much to free ourselves quicker, and sometimes we bite off more than we can choose.  When we decide on these things, of what is and what is not to occur to us while on earth, is usually decided in a heavenly state of existence of peace and harmony, having well forgotten the terrible afflictions we decided upon ourselves the last time round.  And while we are down here, "we do indeed groan, we who dwell in the body, wishing to put away this tent and to be with the Lord."

The Masters are not subjected to incarnate into human bloodlines as they are free from karmic chains.  They are fully evolved into Spirit lines.  We who are still struggling on the physical level are also, at the same time, evolving into our Spirit lines, and at death we endeavor to reconnect with these lines, and in this case we call them 'Group Souls.'  The Masters also belong to Group Souls but they are of a more divine substance.  Their incarnations on the physical level is purely voluntary, though they tend to incarnate into holy priestly physical lines.  The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm what I'm writing as they record Melchizedek being a divine being with the title Elohim bestowed upon him, and Elohim is the god associated with the "creation" concept and not the "formation."  Likewise, the  Nag Hammadi Library also confirms that Melchizedek was Jesus.  I try to double check these things to insure the information I'm receiving is as accurate as possible.  And I'm writing in a hurry as  don't have much time on my hands.

I am aware of some chapters of my "Autobiography" as seen through the Akashic Record and through the assistance of various guides and helpers.  I myself have jumped through various physical bloodlines, whereas the one I am currently connected to will no longer exist once I depart this world.  For many chapters now I have always incarnated into Germany as my starting base but have always lived the majority of my days in other countries.  In my last incarnation I immigrated to America, probably around 1850, and crossed the plains into Indian territory.  I saw this quite detailed through the Akashic during the era of the great Chief Sitting Bull.  I also had a close connection with the Cherokees, but of which I know little, but have worked with a Cherokee Princess in spirit, one of the most powerful spirits I've ever had the privilege to experience.

If you want to know who I once was.  I'll give you a clue - I wrote "Silent Night."

You don't believe me?  Well, there's a lot more you will not believe, or at least doubt.  That's only because you are stuck in the chapter of your own story, a chapter still needing completion.  You can never know the story of your existence, and what brought you to this present time, unless you can turn back some of those pages, perhaps to the previous chapter, or the one before that, maybe then you will gain some inkling of who you are.

It's waiting for you.

The Jesus Controversy 3

Melchizedek Order of High Priest

One of the most mysterious and intriguing characters revealed to us through the Old Testament writings is Melchizedek.  So little is known of him that he rarely gets a mention from church pulpits.  He lived during the time of Abraham and was titled "king of Salem" later to be called Jerusalem.  Salem means 'peace' so he was the king of peace, also Priest of God Most High. Melchizedek has no known genealogy line, no mother or father, no beginning or an end.  So it doesn't take much to conclude that  Melchizedek and Jesus are one and the same spirit.  More on this later. 

I'm bold enough to go back further into the past and say that the great Hindu master, Krishna, was also of the same spirit.  Krishna himself once said that" Fools mock at me when they see me in my transcendental form but do not realize the power that I am and that rules above them." Also: "In order to deliver the pious and annihilate the miscreants I descend myself millennium after millennium." There are similarities between Krishna and Jesus, for instance, Jesus was the incarnation of God where Krishna was the incarnation of Vishnu, both representing the Supreme Being.  Where Jesus is the divine shepherd, Krishna is the divine herdsman. 

All three of these avatars can make claim to the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end.  The Krishna identity is that ancient that I will deal mainly with Melchizedek and Jesus, his later incarnations.  Jesus himself referred to his ancient predestination by stating that before Moses was born, he already was. 

We have to remember that Judah, now well interbred with Benjamin, forms only a very small part of Israel as a whole and it is in their interest that the identity of the Lost Tribes remains lost.  Bear in mind here that that piece of land today called Israel is in many ways a deception and used only for religious and political purposes.  To reclaim their birth land they should have retained the name of Judea not Israel as it has never been known as Israel, whom they always regarded as their enemies.  The question is: does Jesus fit into any of the houses of Israel?  I don't believe so.

Lets go back to the days of Melchizedek for a clue.  We must remember that Jesus was to inherit his Divine titles hundreds of centuries later.  When Melchizedek encountered Abraham, he and Sarah had not long left Egypt; Sarah having been expelled from Egypt by her husband Pharaoh, accompanied by Hagar, an Egyptian handmaiden.  Hagar's presence in the wilderness, so commissioned by the Pharaoh, is itself a mysterious occurrence.  These nomads, sheep herders, were considered an abomination to the Egyptians, thereby I hardly see it conceivable that the Pharaoh would command an Egyptian citizen to live as a slave to the wandering nomads.  This could never have happened.  So Hagar must have been there for another reason entirely.  My conclusion is that Hagar was a Royal Midwife given charge over Sarah who was in child.  My conclusion also is that Sarah was a Mesopotamian princess, Abraham her carer, and her journey into Egypt was to marry the king of Egypt, perhaps for political alliances, a common practice between royal and noble lineages. After all, Sarah, in Hebrew means princess.

Abraham and Sarah, after their sojourn in Egypt, remained residing in the land of Canaan, which some time after was referred to as 'the divine land' or the 'land for worship' by the gentiles that settled there.  This was before the birth of Jacob, who became Israel and fathered the twelve tribes of Israel.  There was no racial or blood connection between Abraham and Melchizedek, yet Melchizedek was the High Priest of Abraham's god.  They were two entirely different racial lines.  It is through the Divine Priestly line of Melchizedek that Jesus obviously descended from. 

The Jesus Controversy 2

Genealogy line

What are the first impressions that enter your mind when you hear the word 'Israel?' Isn't it Jewish?  You straight away associate Israel with the Jews, and solely the Jews? But that's okay.  That's how you have been conditioned to think.  And if you are one of these Christians that carries the Old Testament in the back of your pocket you will also associate Israel as God's chosen people, and probably, as St. Paul stated: first the Jew and then the Gentile.  You won't argue this as you were also taught that Jesus himself was a Jew.  You would associate the Jews with the Holy Land without realizing that that land was considered holy by the gentiles long before the Jews settled there. If you were to dissect the name Israel you would get Is/is Ra/Elohim.  Preordained for the English language?

When we consider the historical fact that Israel was constantly at war with Judah we are tempted to question - was Jesus really Jewish?  It's obvious that the early Church Fathers were determined to connect Jesus to the House of David, in other words, Judah.  They even drew out a long genealogy line connecting Jesus all the way down to Adam.  This could not possibly be accurate because the emergence of man is much older than 6,000 years.  They were determined also to connect Jesus to Biblical prophesies to an expected Jewish messiah whereas the Jews themselves never believed that Jesus was the promised one.  They knew that Jesus was from Galilee which was known as the land of the gentiles and thereby not Jewish.  Jesus declared himself as a messiah and the Jews pointed out to him that the messiah is prophesied to come through the House of David, to which Jesus replied: "If I am from the House of David, then why did David call me Lord?"  Did Jesus here deny having come from the line of David?

We have to bear in mind that the gospels were written long after the event and were copies of earlier originals of which we have no knowledge, and we have no originals to compare the accuracy of later copies.  Arguing that ancient prophesies foretold the coming of Christ because these things manifested in his life is no evidence of truth.  Any later scribe trying to connect Jesus to these ancient prophesies could just as easily have added these events as having occurred in his life.  But this doesn't actually mean that they did. It may simply be an attempt to convince people that Jesus was that promised Jewish messiah.  If this is correct, as no one can prove it wrong, then it has worked.  So it remains a matter of personal faith and belief.

Galilee lies in the north of the Holy Land and is where the real ancient Nation of Israel was located, stretching as far south to Samaria, to the border of ancient Judah.  During the time of Christ all this area was under the jurisdiction of Judea under Roman rule.  Although most of the ten tribes migrated abroad during the invasion,  many of them returned to re-settle in their home land once peace was established with the seafarers.  The Samaritans themselves, who were hated by the Jews, had always declared themselves as being part of the lost tribes of Israel.

The closest of Christ's disciples were Galileans.  They spoke a different dialect as the Jews.  We know this because when Peter denied Christ three times and entirely disassociated himself from Christ the Jews still accused him of being a follower of Christ by saying "You are one of them as your speech betrays you."  besides being recognized as Galileans they were also referred to as the Nazarenes.  Jesus of Nazareth is a badly mistranslated title as the correct translation is Jesus the Nazarene.  They were also mentioned as the "sect of the Nazarenes.'  Obviously, although coming under the dictates of Judaism, they were members of a different religious sect, as were the Essen's of the time.